There’s a discussion being had about expanding the All-Star rosters and it’s gaining momentum. It’s a change in the right direction to reflect the depth of talent in the NBA. Devin Booker, a glaring omission from this year’s roster, believes it’s time for an expansion.
All-Star Roster Set To Expand In Near Future
Phoenix Suns star Booker believes the NBA must expand its All-Star rosters. The league allows teams to carry 15 active players, but All-Star rosters remain capped at 12 per conference.
Booker, a four-time All-Star, supports increasing roster spots to 15 to match regular-season team limits. “I think there’s enough talented guys out here that are deserving,” Booker said after a shootaround at Chase Center.
He pointed to players like Kyrie Irving, Norman Powell, Trae Young, and LaMelo Ball, who all had strong seasons but missed out. “The more talent in there, the better,” Booker emphasized.
Star Performers Left Off the Roster
Seven of the league’s top 20 scorers failed to secure an All-Star spot. That list includes LaMelo, Tyrese Maxey, Booker, De’Aaron Fox, Irving, Powell, and Zach LaVine.
Domantas Sabonis, the NBA’s leading rebounder, was also left out. He averages 20.9 points, 6.6 assists, and a league-high 14.5 rebounds per game. Meanwhile, Young leads the NBA in assists with 11.4 per game while scoring 22.5 points per contest.
Ball ranks fourth in scoring (28.2 points per game) and ninth in assists (7.3). Despite leading all Eastern Conference guards in fan voting, he didn’t make the cut. He became the first player to win the fan vote for his position and still miss the game since the voting system changed in 2016-17.
Anonymous Voting and Ongoing Controversy
NBA coaches anonymously select the All-Star reserves. That process often sparks annual debates about snubbed players.
“Obviously, it’s something I wanted to be a part of,” Booker admitted. “But I’m not going to complain about taking a week to regroup with the family.”
The All-Star snub conversation happens every year. More deserving players emerge than available spots, leaving many frustrated.
The Case for Expansion
With 30 NBA teams, nearly every franchise has at least one borderline All-Star. Some teams, like the Boston Celtics, New York Knicks, and Oklahoma City Thunder, have multiple players worthy of selection.
The NBA stands out as the smallest of the top four American sports leagues. Yet, its All-Star Game features relatively few participants. Other leagues offer significantly larger All-Star rosters:
- NFL Pro Bowl: Over 88 players
- MLB All-Star Game: Over 77 players
- NHL All-Star Game: Over 44 players
- NBA All-Star Game: over 24 players
Given those numbers, the NBA’s current format seems outdated. Expanding to 30 All-Stars—one per team—would ensure better representation.
Reducing the Snub Controversy
Adding six more spots would allow more deserving players to be recognized. It wouldn’t eliminate controversy entirely, but it would make the snubs less egregious.
All-Star selections impact contract extensions and bonuses, making them financially significant for players. Expansion would increase opportunities for rising stars to boost their value and secure bigger deals.
Expanding the All-Star Roster is the Logical Step Forward
The NBA has evolved, and its All-Star format should follow. Expanding the roster to 15 players per conference aligns with regular-season team sizes. It also acknowledges the league’s growing talent pool.
With more stars deserving recognition each year, the push for expansion is gaining momentum. The NBA would act soon to ensure the league’s showcase event includes the best of the best. Don’t be surprised if these expansion happens over the next few years.
© Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images
