{"id":28584,"date":"2020-08-13T20:58:44","date_gmt":"2020-08-14T00:58:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lastwordonsoccer.com\/?p=28584"},"modified":"2020-08-13T20:58:44","modified_gmt":"2020-08-14T00:58:44","slug":"colorado-rapids-season-tickets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/2020\/08\/13\/colorado-rapids-season-tickets\/","title":{"rendered":"Analyzing Pandemic Legal Implication on Colorado Rapids Season Tickets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>EDITORIAL<\/strong> &#8211; When <a href=\"https:\/\/lastwordonsoccer.com\/2020\/03\/19\/colorado-rapids-covid-19\/\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">COVID-19 halted in-person attendance at sporting events<\/a>, season ticket holders (STHs) were left wondering what was going to happen to all of the money that they had spent. MLS teams are providing either a refund or an option to apply any money already paid to the 2021 season. For Colorado Rapids season tickets, STHs wanting to have payments credited towards the 2021 season, no action was required.<\/p>\n<h2>2020 Colorado Rapids Season Tickets: Legal Implications of the Pandemic<\/h2>\n<p>The Colorado Rapids followed up on their March 13, 2020 announcement that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.coloradorapids.com\/covid-19\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">postponed MLS games will be honored<\/a> at rescheduled contests with an email to STHs on May 29, 2020. That email stated the club would be automatically suspending any remaining payments for Colorado Rapids season tickets starting in June, and that to roll over payments to the 2021 season from the 2020 season tickets no action would be required of STHs.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Email from <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ColoradoRapids?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">@ColoradoRapids<\/a> regarding season ticket payments <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/z6E0jChD2x\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">pic.twitter.com\/z6E0jChD2x<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Kevin R. Jensen (@LWOSkevinjensen) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/LWOSkevinjensen\/status\/1293020959373430788?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">August 11, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/LWOSkevinjensen\/status\/1293020959373430788?s=20\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\u201cShould MLS announce that 2020 home matches are cancelled, played without fans, or played out-of-market, we will automatically pull back all funds that you have paid towards the impacted matches as an account credit. If you would like to apply that credit to your 2021 Membership, no action will be required of you.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The email goes on to say that by electing to maintain this credit on your account for next season you will secure your seating location for next year and guarantee your current per game membership pricing for the 2021 season.<\/p>\n<p>From a legal perspective, this is interesting in a couple of different ways. First, by sending this email out, the team is creating contracts with STHs on a mass scale with hardly any written legal paperwork.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWait, you\u2019re telling me that I can receive an email, take absolutely no action, and I\u2019ll be in a legally binding contract with a professional soccer team?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I sure am.<\/p>\n<p>Any legal contract in American law requires a few <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rocketlawyer.com\/article\/basics-of-contract-law-cb.rl\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">basic legal elements<\/a>: an offer, acceptance of that offer, intent to enter into an agreement, and consideration.<\/p>\n<p>Consideration is something of value in exchange for the promised product or service, such as a down-payment for a loan. An offer may invite or require acceptance by an oral or written response, or by performing, or refraining from performing, a specified act. An offer may also give the person accepting the offer the power to make a selection of terms in his acceptance.<\/p>\n<p>In American law, a handshake is just as legally enforceable as a written contract in most cases. Granted, a handshake contract is harder to prove in court than a written contract. Even a simple advertisement in America can be a legally binding contract.<\/p>\n<h3>Legal Precedent for Advertisements as Enforceable Contracts<\/h3>\n<p>Take, for example, the famous English legal case <em><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carlill_v_Carbolic_Smoke_Ball_Co\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.<\/a>, <\/em>which is taught in American law schools as an example of the English common law that American contract law is built upon.<\/p>\n<p>Back in 1891, the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company placed an advertisement in a number of newspapers claiming that it\u2019s product, \u201cThe Carbolic Smoke Ball\u201d would prevent colds and influenza when used three times daily for two weeks. In addition, the company offered a 100\u00a3 reward to anyone who caught influenza using their product, stating that they deposited \u00a31,000 in the bank to back this offer.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Carbolic_smoke_ball_co.jpg#\/media\/File:Carbolic_smoke_ball_co.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/7\/7e\/Carbolic_smoke_ball_co.jpg\" alt=\"Carbolic smoke ball co.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Lilli Carlil used the smoke ball as directed, caught the flu, and sued. Ms. Carlil ultimately won, with the Court of Appeal ruling that the 100\u00a3 reward was meant to be an express promise rather than a sales tactic.<\/p>\n<p>Their reasoning?<\/p>\n<p>That it was quite possible to make an offer to the world and demonstrated their intent referring to the \u00a31,000 deposit, and that Ms. Carlil accepted the contract offer by performance on her part by following the guidelines of \u201cThe Carbolic Smoke Ball.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>An Email from the Club as a Legally Binding Contract<\/h3>\n<p>In this instance, the email from the Colorado Rapids constituted the \u201coffer, which specified the manners of acceptance: Take no action and we\u2019ll apply your credits for you, or contact us and we\u2019ll refund you. It was specified in the offer that inaction will result in acceptance, and will create a legally binding contract between you and the Colorado Rapids. The consideration is the money already paid thus far for the 2020 season tickets. Of course intent to enter into an agreement would still have to be shown if the issue was pressed in court, which may cause issues if the email was never opened.<\/p>\n<p>However, here\u2019s where it gets interesting.<\/p>\n<p>By the very terms of the offer that was extended, the only benefits you\u2019ll receive from the offer is that \u201cby electing to maintain this credit on your account for <strong>next season<\/strong>\u201d you will \u201c(S)ecure your seating location for <strong>next year\u201d<\/strong> and \u201c(G)uarantee your current per game membership for the <strong>2021<\/strong> season.\u201d(emphasis added).<\/p>\n<p>See the wiggle room?<\/p>\n<p>If, let\u2019s say, the 2021 season were to not allow in-person attendance as well, then most of what you\u2019ve received on your end of the bargain is bupkis. However, there would then still the matter of the team not having given you anything for the money you\u2019ve given them with nothing to show for it, which would open another whole can of legal worms.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EDITORIAL &#8211; When COVID-19 halted in-person attendance at sporting events, season ticket holders (STHs) were left wondering what was going to happen to all of the money that they had spent. MLS teams are providing either a refund or an option to apply any money already paid to the 2021 season. For Colorado Rapids season [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3609,"featured_media":28628,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[16,2,119,3],"tags":[3792,35,3775,57,3791],"class_list":["post-28584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-rapids","category-featured","category-mls","category-news","tag-carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-co","tag-colorado-rapids","tag-contract-law","tag-mls","tag-season-tickets"],"modified_by":"Matt Pollard","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3609"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/soccer\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}