{"id":139439,"date":"2023-03-15T19:01:09","date_gmt":"2023-03-15T23:01:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/?p=139439"},"modified":"2023-03-15T19:01:09","modified_gmt":"2023-03-15T23:01:09","slug":"aaron-rodgers-interview-damages-trade-leverage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/2023\/03\/15\/aaron-rodgers-interview-damages-trade-leverage\/","title":{"rendered":"Aaron Rodgers Interview Damages Trade Leverage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is not over, but the <a href=\"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/2023\/03\/15\/aaron-rodgers-announces-intention-to-play-for-new-york-jets-in-2023\/\" target=\"_self\">announcement is done<\/a>.\u00a0 Aaron Rodgers has now made it clear that it is his intention to play for the New York Jets.\u00a0 He made this announcement on the <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/n5WuJ55yeHM\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Pat McAfee Show<\/a> on March 15<sup>th<\/sup>.\u00a0 There is plenty to say about the Packers moving forward and what Rodgers can look like in the Jets offense, but that it not the first thing that stood out to me.\u00a0 As someone who handles negotiations on a near daily basis, it was clear that Rodgers was attempting to harm the Packers trade positions on his way out.\u00a0 The interview blatantly sought to damage trade leverage as the Packers and Jets finalize their deal for Aaron Rodgers.<\/p>\n<p>Rodgers led off the interview saying, \u201cThis isn\u2019t the Decision Day.\u00a0 This isn\u2019t me deciding and announcing to the world that this is what\u2019s going on.\u00a0 In fact, that\u2019s already happened.\u00a0 We\u2019re actually days passed this.\u00a0 This is kind of clearing things up I think.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Aaron Rodgers Damages Trade Leverage On Way Out of Green Bay<\/h2>\n<h4>Propaganda and Negotiating<\/h4>\n<p>Rodgers made it clear that he wanted people to know he is not directing negotiations.\u00a0 He said that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cI haven\u2019t been holding anything up at this point.\u00a0 It\u2019s been compensation that the Packers are trying to get for me. And kind of digging their heels in.\u00a0 So I would just think it is kind of interesting to step back and look at the whole picture.\u00a0 You know my side, appreciation, love and gratitude for everything that Green Bay has done for me.\u00a0 Love, so much love and gratitude and just heart open for the Packer fans and what it meant to be their quarterback.\u00a0 And also, the reality of the situation.\u00a0 You know, like it is what it is.\u00a0 Packers would like to move on.\u00a0 They\u2019ve let me know that in so many words.\u00a0 They\u2019ve let other people know that in direct words.\u00a0 Um, and, because I still have that fire and I want to play and I would like to play in New York, it\u2019s just a matter of getting that done at this point.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The very first thing he wanted to make sure everyone believed was that he was not making demands.\u00a0 He is a very connected person through social media and has always been keenly aware of the way people are talking about him.\u00a0 Jumping in to say how much he is not holding things up is an immediate attack.\u00a0 He knows the memes and the jokes on line and he is trying to put them all down.\u00a0 Further along, Rodgers also felt it necessary to say how the Packers had essentially asked, \u201care you okay if we don\u2019t bring back any of your guys?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This was later addressed again when McAfee brought up the rumor that the Jets have been told to bring in Rodgers\u2019 guys.\u00a0 Based on report the Jets are talking to Randall Cobb and Marcedes Lewis after <a href=\"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/2023\/03\/14\/new-york-jets-add-allen-lazard-as-receiver-shuffle-begins\/\" target=\"_self\">signing Allen Lazard<\/a>.\u00a0 Rodgers was quick to call this ridiculous, but added that he would obviously have said the Jets should sign these three individuals if, you know if, they had called him and asked about it.<\/p>\n<p>McAfee added, \u201csounds like there\u2019s maybe some conversations behind the scenes between the Packers and Jets that are holding this whole thing up, that the fans should maybe send their direct drama and bulls&#8212; hate to, is what I think we just cleared up there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>McAfee even added,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;[Packers] got no leverage either. I don\u2019t know how many people are watching, they\u2019re trying to compare this to the Matthew Stafford situation.\u00a0 Matthew Stafford, a part of the trade and what they gave up is because they were taking on Jared Goff\u2019s contract that was massive.\u00a0 Your contract would be leaving the team, so take that out of the leverage pool.\u00a0 And also they\u2019ve pretty much put them in a position contractually with Jordan Love because they have to decide whether or not they\u2019re going to pick up the fifth year.\u00a0 They made this decision by drafting Jordan Love that everybody else knows that they\u2019re going to another quarterback anyways.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Setting up in everyone\u2019s minds that this is clearly a thing the Packers did to themselves.\u00a0 Partially true, since the Packers have been willing participants in the last several years of this drama.\u00a0 This ignores all the additional harm this interview itself was doing to the Aaron Rodgers trade leverage.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"550\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Aaron Rodgers with a message to Green Bay \ud83d\ude4f <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/38OYzZdetz\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">pic.twitter.com\/38OYzZdetz<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; FOX Sports: NFL (@NFLonFOX) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NFLonFOX\/status\/1636062562365349888?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">March 15, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<h3>Mistakes Were Made, But Not By Me<\/h3>\n<p>The headline of this interview could easily have been \u201cthe Packers have decided to move on.\u201d\u00a0 Rodgers continued to say that this is obviously a business and he understands it.\u00a0 He kept saying that he was not unhappy or mad, but then continued to name names.\u00a0 Rodgers made sure to frame things by starting off saying, \u201cin 2020, they drafted Jordan to replace me.\u201d\u00a0 He also lamented, \u201cthere were probably some people who thought I was as descending player.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rodgers also gave a litany of front office people who drafted him and how the \u201cfront office now is completely different.\u201d\u00a0 He gave huge praise to Bob Harlan and how much he loves him.\u00a0 Then he said that the team told him to take as long as he needed and they wanted him to retire a Packer.\u00a0 \u201cWhen I came out of the darkness, something changed.\u00a0 I\u2019m not exactly sure what that was, but something changed.\u201d\u00a0 He claims that he had checked his phone after five days in the darkness (which he also previously admitted was \u201cparts of three days.\u201d) and found players mentioning there were trade talks.<\/p>\n<p>Rodgers further claims he was 90% set on retiring when he entered \u201cthe darkness,\u201d but had to reconsider this new situation.\u00a0 He added that, \u201calthough the Packers were going to say the right thing publicly, they were ready to move on.\u201d\u00a0 Specifically, Rodgers felt the need to bring up Mark Murphy\u2019s words to show this was all on Green Bay and then said \u201chonestly, I wasn\u2019t offended by it at all\u201d.\u00a0 McAfee pulled it out to say that this is clearly an issue with the Green Bay office.<\/p>\n<p>Rodgers said, \u201cIt\u2019s a different regime and every regime wants to have their guys in there.\u201d\u00a0 This is true in some sense.\u00a0 The Packers promoted Brian Gutenkunst to General Manager in 2018, though he\u2019s been with the team since 1998 (a scout for the team when Rodgers was drafted).\u00a0 Matt LaFleur was named the Head Coach of the Packers in 2019.\u00a0 So, by different regime, he is talking about the staff that has been in place for four years now.\u00a0 The attacks on the &#8220;new regime&#8221; are an attempt to turn fans on the franchise and encourage them to speak out and push the Packers.\u00a0 Just another assault on the Packers trade leverage in the Aaron Rodgers negotiations.<\/p>\n<h4>Pat McAfee Fans Flames Well<\/h4>\n<p>The brilliance of Pat McAfee is how he assuages Rodgers\u2019 ego while letting him say whatever he says.\u00a0 Just having Aaron Rodgers on brings his biggest audiences and the weirder the stance the better, especially when it comes to trade talks.\u00a0 McAfee never challenges Rodgers and when presenting him with the many, rather normal, inferences drawn.\u00a0 McAfee seemed to feel that Rodgers might have taken a comment he made about having a chip on his shoulder as less than complimentary.\u00a0 He quickly turned that into a compliment by making it a comparison to Michael Jordan.\u00a0 McAfee is smart.\u00a0 He is not required to challenge Rodgers or point out the inconsistencies.\u00a0 He is just there to keep Rodgers talking.<\/p>\n<p>Rodgers took the softball questions and drove them as far as he could.\u00a0 \u201cLook at the track record.\u00a0 From the guy sitting over there [referring to A.J. Hawk, to what happened with Jordy Nelson and Randall Cobb and, uh, Julius Peppers, Clay Matthews, Brett Goode, on and on and on.\u00a0 There\u2019s just a way of doing things that, you don\u2019t want to bring them back that\u2019s fine, but there\u2019s a way of it that allows the man to keep the dignity.\u00a0 And honestly, that\u2019s the stuff I was fighting for a couple years ago.\u00a0 Like, how can we do this a little bit better.\u00a0 If you want to be about family, you want to be about love and taking care of our people let\u2019s put our actions where our words at.\u00a0 It\u2019s really important to me, that part is important.\u201d<\/p>\n<h3>Inconsistency in the Narrative<\/h3>\n<p>Later, Rodgers had to admit when Hawk asked if he got a fully supportive text coming out of \u201cthe darkness\u201d that he still would not have wanted to come back to the Packers.\u00a0 Rodgers took the question and avoided it by saying he would not return, but he never felt they would welcome him back.\u00a0 When Hawk tried to redirect him to the question, McAfee jumped in to tell him to just let Rodgers answer the question in whatever way he wanted.<\/p>\n<p>There was a constant juxtaposition of Rodgers repeating the mantra that the Packers were just ready to move on and pointing out that he was not planning to come back even if they had enthusiastically reached out to him after he came out of \u201cthe darkness.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rodgers continued by saying that he loves direct communication and wished they had told him this upfront.\u00a0 Again, Rodgers immediately followed this by taking a shot at Adam Schefter for trying to ask him directly what was going on.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0There was even a little shot at Ian Rapoport in a scenario similar to Adam Schefter reporting on Brady\u2019s retirement last year.\u00a0 Seems as if Rodgers wanted his moment to announce all things in his voice and did not appreciate Rapoport and has <a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2023\/02\/14\/aaron-rodgers-blasts-ian-rapoport-adam-schefter\/amp\/#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&amp;aoh=16789089173020&amp;referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com\" target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">previously made public statements<\/a> about Rapoport including, \u201cThere\u2019s an inner circle, and in my inner circle, nobody talks to Ian Rapoport, to Adam Schefter, or to any of those people.\u201d\u00a0 The final point seems to be that the only source on Aaron Rodgers news will be Aaron Rodgers.<\/p>\n<h3>Negotiations and Leverage<\/h3>\n<p>So, here is a break down of what this does.\u00a0 There was nothing new about the money.\u00a0 The Packers and Jets are fully aware of what the other is doing in terms of contracts and salary cap.\u00a0 Both teams also know the draft capital available as well as players under contract that could be exchanged.\u00a0 Negotiation is far more than that.\u00a0 There must be a position from which you can work.\u00a0 One of the best bargaining chips is knowing the point where you walk away from the table.\u00a0 There is always that point, or at least the threat of it.\u00a0 Aaron Rodgers just told the world that there is no walking away and this has to happen.\u00a0 He has also now said that he will not play for the Packers.\u00a0 If you know that, you know they cannot walk away.<\/p>\n<p>Another point is creating some sort of bidding, or at least the appearance of bidding.\u00a0 Sure, the Raiders jumped out (likely due to Packers being honest about state of negotiations), but the knowledge that Rodgers will not accept another trade partner further diminishes the team\u2019s position.<\/p>\n<p>The part here that is more unique to sports teams is the feeling of the fanbase.\u00a0 Whether or not it will happen, Rodgers is hoping to keep saying he loves Green Bay and the fans while he simultaneous is explicitly urging them to put pressure on the team to make this trade quickly and at a loss if necessary.\u00a0 This interview was an assault on the Packers\u2019 bargaining position in an attempt to harm the team.\u00a0 The clear objective is to get out of Green Bay quickly and also ensure the Packers get less now than they could have bargained for prior to the interview.\u00a0 By doing this, he is harming the Packers future roster and hamstringing Jordan Love and the team.\u00a0 Aaron Rodgers is too smart to not have done this to intentionally harm his trade value.<\/p>\n<p><em>Main Photo: Mike De Sisti &#8211; USA Today Sports<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is not over, but the announcement is done.\u00a0 Aaron Rodgers has now made it clear that it is his intention to play for the New York Jets.\u00a0 He made this announcement on the Pat McAfee Show on March 15th.\u00a0 There is plenty to say about the Packers moving forward and what Rodgers can look [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1726,"featured_media":139445,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","sfio_featured_image":false,"sfio_embed_code":"","_ef_editorial_meta_date_first-draft-date":"","_ef_editorial_meta_paragraph_assignment":"","_ef_editorial_meta_checkbox_needs-photo":"","_ef_editorial_meta_number_word-count":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[25,6],"tags":[275,7460],"class_list":["post-139439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-packers","category-jets","tag-aaron-rodgers","tag-green-bay-packers-news"],"modified_by":"David Latham, Managing Editor","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1726"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139439"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139439\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/139445"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lastwordonsports.com\/nfl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}