Noam Chomsky, the great American linguist and theorist, once said that if the average American\u2019s understanding of the complex mathematics of baseball could only be applied to other areas of life, then America would be a nation of mathematicians.<\/p>\n
The same is true of football and the rest of the world; if the average football fan\u2019s knowledge of football history (especially their own club or country\u2019s history) could be applied to other areas of life, then the world would be one full of historians.<\/p>\n
Fans who might otherwise have no interest in history still know all about the great figures from their own football team’s past.<\/p>\n
Consequently, as Arsenal<\/a> and Wolves<\/a> prepare to meet in the Premier League this weekend, there will be many memories of the greatest managers in the history of the two clubs, Herbert Chapman<\/a> and Stan Cullis, especially when they had one thing in common: a belief in the importance of European club football.<\/p>\n Chapman\u2019s status in the history of the game is secure, especially among Arsenal fans. His nicknames include \u201cThe Emperor of Football\u201d, or \u201cThe Frank Capra of Football\u201d; because just as Capra (the creator of \u201cIt Happened One Night\u201d and \u201cIt\u2019s A Wonderful Life\u201d) effectively established the profession of film director, so Chapman effectively established the profession of football manager.<\/p>\n His feats at Arsenal<\/a>, and indeed at Huddersfield before he came to London, are well-known: winning a hat-trick of league titles at Huddersfield between 1924 and 1926; leading Arsenal to their first ever trophy (the FA Cup) in 1930 and their first league title a year later; and above all setting Arsenal on the path to becoming the first world-famous football club, a legacy that is still evident today in the extraordinary number of clubs carrying the name \u201cArsenal\u201d around the world, from Argentina to Ukraine.<\/p>\n What is less well-known about Chapman is that he envisaged European club football a full two decades before it actually came into existence. Chapman was a ceaseless innovator on and off the pitch.<\/p>\n For example, he famously had the Gillespie Road tube station renamed Arsenal, literally putting the club, which never found success to that point, on the map.<\/p>\n It was in this vein that, having dominated English football for nearly a decade, first with Huddersfield and then with Arsenal<\/a>, he first began to dream of pitting his great Arsenal side against the best club sides that continental Europe could offer.<\/p>\n Tragically, Chapman died on 6 January 1934, aged only 55, after contracting pneumonia while watching a third team match, and so he did not see his \u201cEuropean dream\u201d come to fruition.<\/p>\n Nevertheless, his vision of midweek games between teams from different countries being played under floodlights (another development that Chapman was instrumental in popularising), was exactly what European club football became two decades after his death.<\/p>\n In fact, although Chapman\u2019s Arsenal did not compete against the best that European club football had to offer, they effectively did compete against, and defeat, the best that world<\/em> football had to offer.<\/p>\n That was in the infamous \u201cBattle of Highbury\u201d on 14 November 1934, less than a year after Chapman\u2019s untimely death, when an England side containing no fewer than seven Arsenal<\/a> players beat the reigning World Cup Champions, Italy, at Arsenal’s home ground.<\/p>\n At a time when English football was so secure in its own supremacy that it did not bother to send a team to the first two World Cups (in Uruguay in 1930 and in Italy in 1934), the match was seen as an unofficial \u201cWorld Championship decider\u201d.<\/p>\n The fact that Arsenal\/England won 3-2 was proof of the greatness of Chapman\u2019s side, although the violent nature of the match did little to promote the international goodwill that Chapman always thought would be a by-product of international sporting competition.<\/p>\n The onset of the Second World War put paid to most domestic football in Europe, let alone any prospect of international club football. Therefore, it was only in the 1950s that Chapman\u2019s idea of European club competition came back into vogue.<\/p>\n By then, however, it was not Arsenal who were championing the cause but their successors as the dominant force in English football, Stan Cullis\u2019s Wolverhampton Wanderers.<\/p>\n Cullis is one of the best examples of the old adage that failed players often make the best managers because those players often channel all the frustrations of their unsuccessful playing career into succeeding as a manager.<\/p>\n Usually, it is injury that is responsible for such managerial careers, as in the case of Brian Clough and Eddie Howe (to name but two). In Cullis\u2019s case, however, it was the onset of global conflict that put paid to his playing ambitions.<\/p>\n Cullis had played as a centre-half in the fine Wolves team before the war, which in 1939 almost did the league and cup double\u00a0before they collapsed at the end of the season in the league and then lost the FA Cup Final to Portsmouth 4-1.<\/p>\n Then, before Cullis and the other Wolves players could avenge that crushing defeat, war broke out and, like so many other European players of his vintage, Cullis lost the best years of his career to military service, during which he worked for the British armed forces as a physical instructor.<\/p>\n Soon after the war, in 1948, Cullis became the manager of Wolves. Apart from an FA Cup win in 1949, the first five years of his reign were largely spent watching Arsenal reassert their old pre-war dominance.<\/p>\n That finally came to an end in 1953, when the Gunners won their last trophy until their re-emergence in the early 1970s. Wolves then filled the vacuum left by Arsenal and won their first ever league title in 1954.<\/p>\n However, it was what followed next that showed how Cullis thrillingly realised Chapman’s European ambitions.<\/p>\n International football between countries was old news, but international football between club sides was still not a reality in the mid-1950s.<\/p>\n However, in the wake of England\u2019s humiliating pair of defeats to the great Hungary side of Puskas et al (6-3 at Wembley in late 1953 and 7-1 in Budapest in early 1954), the idea began that the best club sides from the two countries should play each other.<\/p>\n Thus it was that just before Christmas in 1954, Wolverhampton Wanderers of England played Honv\u00e9d FC of Hungary, supposedly in a friendly but in reality for the unofficial title of \u201cEuropean Club Champions\u201d.<\/p>\n The match brought Chapman\u2019s dream to life; two champion sides facing each other (indeed, Honv\u00e9d contained many members of the Hungarian national side, including Puskas himself); football under floodlights that lent the game the kind of innate theatrical quality that is still seen on the best Champions League nights today; and it was even broadcast live on the BBC, at a time when the only football matches that were ever broadcast live on television were the FA Cup Final and the odd England international.<\/p>\n Wolves were led by the great defender Billy Wright, who had endured personal humiliation at Wembley when Puskas\u2019s famous drag back before Hungary\u2019s third goal put him out of the game.<\/p>\n However, Wright and indeed English football as a whole gained some measure of revenge as Wolves eventually won a genuinely classic match 3-2. And just like the Arsenal\/England side that had beaten World Cup winners Italy two decades earlier, Cullis claimed that his Wolves side were the true \u201cChampions of the World\u201d.<\/p>\n It was precisely because journalists from continental Europe, notably Gabriel Hanot of L’\u00c9quipe<\/em>, disagreed with that assessment, claiming that Wolves had only won because of the muddy Molineux pitch, that within a few weeks L’\u00c9quipe <\/em>proposed a genuine, bona fide \u201cEuropean Cup\u201d, to be contested by the champions of every country in Europe (even those that were now under Communist rule in Eastern Europe).<\/p>\n And in just over 18 months’ time, at the start of the 1955-56 season, the European Cup – the precursor to the Champions League – began.<\/p>\n Neither Arsenal<\/a> nor Wolves have excelled in Europe much since, with Arsenal winning only two European trophies (the 1970 Fairs or UEFA Cup and the 1994 Cup-Winners\u2019 Cup) and Wolves reaching only one European final (the two-legged 1972 Fairs or UEFA Cup Final, which they lost to Spurs).<\/p>\n Chapman and Cullis both dreamed of pitting their sides \u2013 the Champions of England \u2013 against the best that continental Europe had to offer. Although Chapman died before his dream came true, Cullis saw his realised.<\/p>\n What is also worth emphasising now, at a time when yet again there is much talk of the creation of a \u201cEuropean Superleague\u201d, is that both men would have loathed the idea of the kind of closed shop for the big clubs that is currently under proposal.<\/p>\n Having first achieved success at smaller regional clubs like Huddersfield and Wolves, they both passionately believed in the importance of competition in football at all levels.<\/p>\n They would certainly never have agreed with the model now being proposed, whereby clubs like Huddersfield and Wolves (and Leeds and Valencia and Hamburg, all of whom have reached, and in Hamburg’s case actually won, European Cup finals) would never <\/em>have the chance of even competing for the ultimate prize in club football.<\/p>\n Main Image Credit:Chapman and Cullis European Dream Remembered<\/h1>\n
Legendary Innovator<\/h2>\n
Battle of Highbury<\/h2>\n
Rise of Cullis and Wolves<\/h2>\n
European Club Champions<\/h2>\n
Momentary Success<\/h2>\n
Lasting Legacy<\/h2>\n
\nEmbed from Getty Images<\/a>